|
Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject | 
 enlarge | Author: Saba Mahmood
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Category: Book
List Price: $23.95
Buy Used: $14.99
You Save: $8.96 (37%)
New (25) Used (14) from $14.99
Rating:  4 reviews
Sales Rank: 97036
Media: Paperback
Pages: 233
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8
Dimensions (in): 9 x 5.8 x 0.4
ISBN: 0691086958
Dewey Decimal Number: 305.48697096216
EAN: 9780691086958
ASIN: 0691086958
Publication Date: October 25, 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: SOFTCOVER LOOKS FINE PAGES ARE FINE
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Politics of Piety is a groundbreaking analysis of Islamist cultural politics through the ethnography of a thriving, grassroots women's piety movement in the mosques of Cairo, Egypt. Unlike those organized Islamist activities that seek to seize or transform the state, this is a moral reform movement whose orthodox practices are commonly viewed as inconsequential to Egypt's political landscape. Saba Mahmood's compelling exposition of these practices challenges this assumption by showing how the ethical and the political are indelibly linked within the context of such movements. Not only is this book a sensitive ethnography of a critical but largely ignored dimension of the Islamic revival, it is also an unflinching critique of the secular-liberal principles by which some people hold such movements to account. The book addresses three central questions: How do movements of moral reform help us rethink the normative liberal account of politics? How does the adherence of women to the patriarchal norms at the core of such movements parochialize key assumptions within feminist theory about freedom, agency, authority, and the human subject? How does a consideration of debates about embodied religious rituals among Islamists and their secular critics help us understand the conceptual relationship between bodily form and political imaginaries? Politics of Piety is essential reading for anyone interested in issues at the nexus of ethics and politics, embodiment and gender, and liberalism and postcolonialism.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 A Radically New Way of Thinking About Feminist Issues in the Arab World March 8, 2006
Etienne ROLLAND-PIEGUE (Tokyo, Japan)
35 out of 41 found this review helpful
Radical feminists, of the post-structuralist or deconstructionist blend, have accustomed us to put into question notions that have long been a constitutive part of the liberal/progressive agenda and to critically reexamine well-established categories such as gender, class or race. It should therefore come as no surprise if Saba Mahmood, an anthropologist trained in the intellectual hotbed of UC Berkeley, provides a description of the Muslim world that goes against the grain of conventional wisdom and shatters many certainties held dear by feminists and liberals alike.
Mahmood's Politics of Piety is an ethnographic account of the Islamic revival in Egypt, viewed from the perspective of women of different walks of life who regularly attend religious lessons delivered by female preachers in mosques of Cairo. Teachings focus on the study of Islamic scriptures, but also address the social norms, personal orientations and bodily comportments deemed necessary to cultivate a pious and virtuous life.
This is the first time in Egyptian history that such a large number of women have mobilized to hold public meetings in mosques to teach each other Islamic doctrine, thereby altering the historically male-centered character of mosques as well as Islamic pedagogy. On the other hand, the women's mosque movement emphasizes conducts and virtues that are traditionally associated with feminine passivity and submissiveness, such as shyness, modesty, perseverance and humility (although these virtues have to be interpreted in an Islamic context).
Traditional feminist interpretations would tend to analyze this mosque movement through the normative framework of women's autonomy and emancipation, either to decry its participants' submission to oppressive norms or to detect strategies of resistance and reinterpretation that allow these women to articulate a distinctively female voice and agenda. Both interpretations would miss the point. They posit that women's self-realization and autonomy can only be asserted in opposition to prevailing social norms and institutions, whereas the women described by Mahmood draw their very raison d'etre and sense of identity from their submission to God's commands and their emulation of a virtuous self.
To illustrate this point, Mahmood takes the case of the Islamic veil, which has been the object of numerous studies. Although many explanations have been provided for its resurgence in modern Egypt, identifying the veil as a symbol of resistance to the hegemony of Western values or as a convenient device to navigate through urban space, few attention has been devoted to ideas of female modesty or piety as Islamic virtues, although it is in these terms that many women who decide to wear the veil frame their decision. According to their own words, the veil is not something that could be separated from the pious virtues of modesty and submission, as if one could oppose an "inner" self from its public display. Instead, bodily acts such as wearing the veil or conducting oneself modestly in the presence of men are both a mean for acquiring these virtues and these virtues themselves. The veil in this sense is the expression of the process of both being and becoming a certain kind of a person, and not the manifestation of a preformed self.
Mahmood's consideration for her informants' own words and justifications is not motivated by the anthropologist's desire to remain "true" to her subject: rather, the terms and concepts used by the mosque movement "talk back" to the analytical tools used in social science and to the presuppositions of the feminist agenda. She concludes by arguing that "the liberatory goals of feminism should be rethought in light of the fact that the desire for freedom and liberation is a historically situated desire whose motivational force cannot be assumed a priori, but needs to be reconsidered in light of other desires, aspirations, and capacities."
 dumping the baby with the bath water March 19, 2006
A. Stone
7 out of 40 found this review helpful
Mahmood has a pleasant, easy-going style, which makes for good reading. She makes every effort in her ethnographic work to put herself into the place of the women of the mosque movement. She seems to look at the situation from the presupposition that people are purely products of their circumstances, which precludes much in the way of personal choice. I prefer to believe we do have choice. While I respect the choice these women have made, I think it would be a mistatke to assume that there's no coersion or oppression in their lives. That is, it's fine to accept the choices people make, but oppression is still oppression. Yes, let's see things as much as we are able from the subject's point of view, but lets not pretend oppression and subjugation aren't still oppression and sujugation.
politics of piety: the Islamic revival and feminist subject October 8, 2007
Gu Hongli
1 out of 7 found this review helpful
The book is in very good condition (just like new) and it reached me within two weeks,just as amazon promised. I am quite satisfied with your service.
 Where are the women? June 27, 2008
Nora R. Hope (Philadelphia)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Although Mahmoud makes fine arguments about Muslim women and she questions the inevitability/desirability of secularism for all peoples, her pure pleasure in wielding theory outweighs "the stuff" of the book. This reader came away wondering who, other than the author, actually inhabits the book. Certainly there were memorable women whose stories were edited out in favor of discussions about western theoreticians. Mahmood's audience cannot include students; they are mystified. This is a shame because perhaps there is no subject that begs more for good, clear writing by scholars than works about Muslim women.
|
|
|
|
| |
