|
A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change | 
 enlarge | Author: Robert Bideleux
Publisher: Routledge
Category: Book
List Price: $45.95
Buy Used: $16.94
You Save: $29.01 (63%)
New (20) Used (17) from $16.94
Rating:  1 reviews
Sales Rank: 1214042
Media: Paperback
Edition: 1
Pages: 700
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2
Dimensions (in): 9.2 x 6 x 1.5
ISBN: 0415161126
Dewey Decimal Number: 947
EAN: 9780415161121
ASIN: 0415161126
Publication Date: January 28, 1998
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Pages have very limited markings. Soft cover binding is secure but the spine is creased. Cover is in good shape with just a creased lower front corner. Have questions? We're happy to provide more information about any item in our store. We pack carefully, ship daily and email tracking numbers to US buyers. Our customer service is friendly and we comply with all Amazon return policies. International & APO orders are welcome!
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The recent history of Eastern Europe is one of ethnic and national conflict following the collapse of Communism. In A History of Eastern Europe, Robert Bideleux and Ian Jeffries argue that the increasingly complex problems of the post-communist present cannot be understood without the long context they offer here.
The authors provide a thematic historical survey and analysis of the formative processes of political, social and economic change which have played the paramount roles in shaping the development of this region. Though giving particular weight to the last century, this book also includes: coverage of ancient and medieval times; a discussion of the Reformation, counter-reformation, the Renaissance and the medieval kingdoms; the influence of Russia and Prussia; and a useful bibliography.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Inadequate June 17, 2000
11 out of 17 found this review helpful
This is one of those books that bring coal to Newcastle. The main thesis of Part I is that not everything about Ottoman Empire was bad and the authors proceed to prove it by refuting statements of books written mostly in the 60's in communist countries (as if previously revisionist views on this topic haven't been almost the predominant opinion since the last few decades). The refutations are carried out mainly by quoting statements from a few books from the 50's and 60's, thus sparing the reader of supporting arguments and documentation on beliefs fostered by the most up-to-date stereotypes (such as the obscurantism of Orthodox church and the absolute rejection of 'ethnic nationalism'). We learn (together with new international students in their college orientation program)to be less Eurocentric with sentences like: "Europeans were caught almost completely off-guard by the remarkably rapid rise of the Ottoman 'menace' (as contemporaries perceived it)" : Quotation marks apparently aren't enough to warn us that the menace was subjective. They need to make the warning explicit. Throughout the book, the authors (although they 'are conversant with several European languages')have focused mainly on English-language secondary sources for the interesting reason that looking at primary sources and more specialized research monographs wouldn't be efficient enough for them to reach their geopolitical moral. Ironically, the political correct warnings andquotation marks don't prevent the authors from their neo-colonial tendencies expressed most amusingly in their skepticism about the national liberation movements of the 19th century because of the new state's failure to become immediately indistinguishable in form from the most advanced Western European states. (By the way, they do prove convincinly that Western Europe has consistently been more prosperous than the new Balkan states.) Despite its being very readable the interested reader would be better off with other books on the subject (M. Glenny's book on the Balkans, Mazower's 'Dark Continent' come to mind) and, yes, 'more narrowly focused research monographs'.
|
|
|
|
| |
